Loading...
The Vapor Pro occupies a strange place in golf history. It was the blade Rory McIlroy played during his 2015 season, it was arguably the best iron Nike ever made, and within two years of its release Nike had quit the club business entirely. That makes this a discontinued blade from a company that no longer makes clubs, which matters a lot for how you should think about buying one in the used market.
As a golf club, though, it deserves more credit than the Nike swoosh sometimes gets. The Vapor Pro is a forged muscle back with what Nike called Modern Muscle geometry, which shifted weight to center the mass directly behind the impact point rather than letting it drift toward the heel the way traditional blade shapes do. The idea was a blade that felt like a blade but delivered slightly more consistent ball speed on the strikes that miss the middle by a groove or two.
Be honest with yourself before chasing one. This is a players iron in the fullest sense. If you don't strike your irons well, the Vapor Pro will report every mistake back to you without softening the news. If you do, it remains a genuinely satisfying club to hit, and used prices are lower than comparable blades from brands still in business.
In short
The Nike Vapor Pro (2015) is a compact blade for skilled ball-strikers who want feel and shot control.
Refresh due soon
Brands in this category update about every 2 years, and the Vapor Pro is 11 years old with no successor yet, so a new model could land any time. Grab it at clearance pricing now, or wait a few weeks to see what replaces it.
Based on release timing and this line's typical refresh cycle, not a live price quote.
Stock steel shaft. Lofts are approximate and subject to manufacturing tolerances.
The head is a forged muscle back with an RZN resin insert tucked into the small cavity behind the face, which Nike used to fine-tune feel and free up a bit of discretionary weight. The Modern Muscle shaping is the real story here. Traditional blades carry their center of gravity slightly toward the heel because of hosel mass, and Nike repositioned weight to line the CG up with the center of the face. In practice that means shots struck slightly off-center lose a little less speed and direction than you'd expect from a club this compact. At address it looks the part. Thin topline, minimal offset, a short blade length, and a satin chrome finish that has held up reasonably well on most used examples. Nike never published detailed loft specs that survive in circulation today, but the set followed traditional players-iron lofts, so expect them to play roughly a club weaker than a modern game-improvement set. That's not a flaw. It's what a blade from this era is supposed to be.
Yes. McIlroy played the Vapor Pro during the 2015 season, and Nike built the club with input from him and Tiger Woods. He moved to TaylorMade equipment after Nike stopped making clubs in 2016.
For the right player, yes. The forging quality and design hold up against blades from the same era, and prices are typically lower because Nike no longer supports the golf equipment business. Check face wear and groove condition carefully, since there's no manufacturer to service them.
Not very, and they don't pretend to be. The Modern Muscle weighting makes them marginally more stable than an old-school blade, but this is still a compact muscle back. Mid and high handicaps will lose significant distance and accuracy on off-center strikes.
Any competent club fitter or repair shop can reshaft, regrip, or adjust the loft and lie on these irons. What you can't get is factory support or replacement heads from Nike, so a cracked or badly worn head means finding another used one.
The Vapor Pro is a pure muscle back blade throughout the set. The Vapor Pro Combo mixed in cavity back long irons for added forgiveness while keeping blade-style short irons. If you want help on the long end, the Combo is the more practical choice.
No ratings yet. Sign in to rate this club.
Other blade iron models from different brands, closest to its model year.
Use as your baseline in the recommendation tool, or compare side-by-side with another set.