Specs, loft charts and modeled carry for two sets golfers cross-shop. Ping G440 and TaylorMade Qi Max each have a full page.
| Spec | Ping G440 | TaylorMade Qi Max |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Game Improvement | Game Improvement |
| Player type | Mid Handicap | High Handicap |
| Model year | 2026 | 2026 |
| 7-iron loft | 28.5° | 27° |
| PW loft | 43.5° | 41° |
| Set makeup | 5-iron to PW | 5-iron to PW |
| MSRP | $1,149 | $1,149 |
| Technology | Cast, Hollow Body, Variable Face Thickness, Perimeter Weighting | Hollow Body, Stronger Lofts, Perimeter Weighting, AI Designed Face |
| Editorial recognition | Golf Digest, MyGolfSpy | Golf Digest |
| Club | Ping G440 | TaylorMade Qi Max | Loft delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5i | 22° | 20° | +2° |
| 6i | 25° | 23.5° | +1.5° |
| 7i | 28.5° | 27° | +1.5° |
| 8i | 33° | 31° | +2° |
| 9i | 38° | 36° | +2° |
| PW | 43.5° | 41° | +2.5° |
Modeled from TrackMan-based norms scaled to each set's lofts, not measured for these models.
| Club | Moderate swing | Average swing | Faster swing | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G440 | Qi Max | G440 | Qi Max | G440 | Qi Max | |
| 5i | 162 y | 166 y | 179 y | 183 y | 195 y | 199 y |
| 6i | 153 y | 157 y | 169 y | 173 y | 184 y | 188 y |
| 7i | 143 y | 147 y | 158 y | 162 y | 172 y | 176 y |
| 8i | 133 y | 137 y | 147 y | 151 y | 160 y | 164 y |
| 9i | 122 y | 125 y | 135 y | 138 y | 147 y | 150 y |
| PW | 112 y | 115 y | 124 y | 127 y | 135 y | 138 y |
| Club | Ping G440 | TaylorMade Qi Max | Δ carry |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5i | 166 yd | 168 yd | +1 |
| 6i | 159 yd | 159 yd | 0 |
| 7i(anchor) | 150 yd | 150 yd | 0 |
| 8i | 139 yd | 140 yd | +1 |
| 9i | 126 yd | 128 yd | +1 |
| PW | 113 yd | 115 yd | +3 |
| Estimated from loft specs · ±5 yd accuracy | avg +1.0 yd | ||
The clearest gap between these two is loft. The TaylorMade Qi Max runs a 27° 7-iron against 28.5° on the Ping G440, a 1.5 degree difference that works out to roughly 4 yards more carry at the same swing speed. That extra distance raises a gapping question at the bottom of the bag, since the Qi Max PW sits at 41° and the G440 PW at 43.5°. Both are hollow body, perimeter weighted game improvement sets, 5-iron to PW, at $1149 apiece. The Qi Max leans on an AI designed face and stronger lofts to chase distance. The G440 is cast with a variable face thickness, and it carries stronger editorial marks, 92/100 from Golf Digest and 90/100 from MyGolfSpy, next to the Qi Max at 78/100 from Golf Digest.
For most golfers shopping game improvement irons, the Ping G440 is the safer pick. The editorial gap is wide, the price is identical, and the weaker lofts make it easier to slot above existing wedges. Choose the TaylorMade Qi Max if raw carry distance is the priority and you are willing to rework your wedge lofts to close the gap. If feel matters more, neither spec sheet settles that, so a fitting is worth the time.